Eyerdam Opinion
Close the Watson Island Airport Immediately
So the Herald headline says Miami Commission to consider Watson Island heliport, to draw tourists.
Then I go looking through the article for the most important issue. It is not there.
Instead the Herald’s tourist reporter reports that:
Is this a terrorist attack on cruise ships?
“Miami is a beautiful city,” Commissioner Francis Suarez said. “You want to have a place where tourists can come, get in a helicopter, see the city, see the Everglades.”
And to accomplish the snarky factor the reporter reports: “But some critics allege the city has cut a sweetheart deal with the heliport operator, and ought to collect more in rent than the amount being proposed. The contract calls for Linden to invest $1.45 million in the infrastructure, plus pay a minimum rent of $2,200 a month or a percentage of gross revenues for the first two years. The payments increase annually.”
And there is this incorrect insight: “Miami is one of a handful of major cities without a heliport. Watson Island has had a helicopter landing pad in the past, but it hasn’t been open for several years. Most helicopters end up at Opa-locka Executive Airport or Kendall-Tamiami Executive Airport.”
Wonder why?
Commissioner Wilfredo “Willy” Gort said he doesn’t see any problems.
Said Commissioner Marc Sarnoff: “The good news is that the rent will increase as they build out the heliport. It’s an important asset for the city to have.”
Ok. What is directly across from Watson Island? Why are all private boats prohibited from traveling through Government Cut when there are Cruise Ships at their berth? What happened on 9/11? What happened to the USS Cole?
All the Commissioners and the Herald have in mind is revenue and politics.
Meanwhile the USCG Captain of the Port has been struggling for years to close Government Cut to all aircraft landing or flying low because there is no way - NO WAY - to prevent a crazy pilot or skilled terrorist from CRASHING a seaplane or helicopter FULL of EXPLOSIVES into a CRUISE SHIP – if they are permitted to fly low and land in the area.
Government Cut is a FAA and TSA permitted airport adjacent to a very high risk port. And the FAA, clinging to surf and turf, has refused to decommission the watery airport and end the risk of terrorist attack.
The greatest single potential for a terrorist attack in Florida is a cruise ship owned by a family of Jewish millionaires full of indulgent, sinful capitalists floating in plain view of the Miami Herald newsroom and an NBC studio.
Please pay attention to reality and shoot down this very risky airport scheme. We have real airports for this sort of thing.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/23/2814425/miami-commission-to-consider-watson.html#storylink=cpy
THIS JUST IN FROM FEMA/DHS - the top terrorists threats"
National Prevention Framework 4 Working Draft—Pre-Decisional
Risk Basis 123
The Secretary of Homeland Security led an interagency effort to conduct a Strategic National Risk Assessment (SNRA). The SNRA identifies the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk to the Nation, which, in turn, informs the identification of the core capabilities essential to address these risks in each of the five preparedness mission areas—Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response and Recovery—in the National Preparedness Goal. This Framework addresses delivery of the core capabilities required to prevent the following adversarial/human-caused threats identified in the SNRA.6 130
Cyber threats identified in the SRNA are addressed in the Protection Framework.
|
Table 1: SNRA Adversarial/Human-caused National-level Events 131 Row |
Threat Type |
National-level Event Description |
|
1 |
Aircraft as a Weapon |
A hostile non-state actor(s) crashes a commercial or general aviation aircraft into a physical target within the United States. |
|
2 |
Armed Assault |
A hostile non-state actor(s) uses assault tactics to conduct strikes on vulnerable target(s) within the United States resulting in at least one fatality or injury. |
|
3 |
Biological Terrorism Attack (non-food) |
A hostile non-state actor(s) releases a biological agent against an outdoor, indoor, or water target, directed at a concentration of people within the United States. |
|
4 |
Chemical/Biological Food Contamination Terrorism Attack |
A hostile non-state actor(s) disperses a biological or chemical agent into food supplies within the U.S. supply chain. |
|
5 |
Chemical Terrorism Attack (non-food) |
A hostile non-state actor(s) releases a chemical agent against an outdoor, indoor, or water target, directed at a concentration of people using an aerosol, ingestion, or dermal route of exposure. |
|
6 |
Explosives Terrorism Attack |
A hostile non-state actor(s) deploys a man-portable improvised explosive device (IED), vehicle-borne IED, or vessel IED in the United States against a concentration of people, and/or structures such as critical commercial or government facilities, transportation targets, or critical infrastructure sites, resulting in at least one fatality or injury. |
|
7 |
Nuclear Terrorism Attack |
A hostile non-state actor(s) acquires an improvised nuclear weapon through manufacture from fissile material, purchase, or theft and detonates it within a major U.S. population center. |

