South East Shipping News

ACE leaking data. CBP says its operator error

CSMS# 13-000064 - Improperly Formatted ACE Ocean Manifest Data Resulting in Release of Confidential Data

02/07/2013 01:51 PM EST

Ocean Manifest





CBP has received numerous complaints from importers/consignees regarding specific data (namely, party/shipper/consignee name and address) that has been publicly disclosed despite their submitted requests for confidentiality in accordance with 19 CFR 103.31 (d). After thorough investigation, CBP has determined that this occurrence is the result of to the improper data entry by users and NOT CBP programming or systems error. The trade is reminded they are required to strictly adhere to the data formats in the Implementation Guidelines (IGs). As indicated in the IGs, the commercial party name fields must ONLY contain commercial party name data. Data transmitters are including “street address” data in the fields for “commercial party name." As a result, the name of the party stored in the ACE database is corrupted because it includes address data. This inaccurate party name data fails the confidentiality edits resulting in confidential business information being shared publicly. This inadvertent disclosure is tied directly to the way in which data is transmitted by users.



Carriers and other parties filing ocean manifest transactions MUST take action to ensure their software is correctly formatting this data. The commercial party name and address data fields are located in the CAMIR (records S01, U01, N01) and ANSI X12 (N1 segment). The ACE Implementation Guidelines can be found on the CBP website:

http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/automated/modernization/ace_edi_messages/ace_guidelines/



Additional information was also provided in CSMS (08-000222), copied below for your reference, describing the process by which CBP discloses electronic vessel cargo information.



In accordance with Title 19, United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 1431(c), electronic vessel cargo information provided to CBP via Vessel AMS is subject to public disclosure. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations at Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 103.31 (e) identify the following data elements that are made available to the public on a recurring basis through a subscription that is administered by the Office of Administration and the Office of Information and Technology:



Carrier code

Manifest quantity

Notify party name (1)

Vessel country code

Manifest units

Notify party address (1)

Vessel name

Weight

Piece count

Voyage number

Weight unit

Description of goods

District/port of unlading

Shipper name (1)

Container number

Estimated arrival date

Shipper address (1)

Seal number

Bill of lading number

Consignee name (1)

Foreign port of lading

Consignee address (1)



(1) Designates a data element which will be deleted where confidentiality has been requested in accordance with 19 CFR 103.31 (d).

Facebook Graph “a stalker’s heaven.”

 

The privacy implications of Facebook Graph Search

 Posted on 04 February 2013.

 With a billion people sharing an assortment of personal information on a daily basis, Facebook holds the most significant amount of private information in today's connected world.

 

To allow easier data access, and a new way to navigate more than 240 billion photos and more than a trillion connections among its users, Facebook recently announced Graph Search.

 

While Graph Search is described as a way to allow people to make new connections, it's undeniably a powerful tool for unearthing a wealth information in a highly accessible manner. You could call it stalker's heaven.

 

"Harvesting this information prior to Graph Search would have involved hours to days to weeks of painstakingly manual reviews. Additionally, the data would soon become dated and require periodic rescanning. Scripting could help automate some of this activity, however this is often a difficult task due to constantly changing environments. Now with the advent of Graph Search anyone can instantly discover the goods within seconds," said Salvador Le Grec, founder of NovaInfosec.com.

 

I've composed a few searches and got embarrassing results in just a few minutes. Want to know how many employees in one of the world's biggest software companies like malware? Tons. How about how many in the same company like soft drugs? Even more. These are their private profiles but it doesn't look good for the brand, does it?

 

The enterprise threat

 

While plenty of organizations forbid the use of social networking in the workplace, not many can outright forbid their employees to indulge in such online activities in general. The problem lies in the fact that the exposure of personal information can impact not only the individual, but also the company they work for.

 

"Graph Search could potentially unveil employees' positions and interests that are contrary to an organization’s overall image," said Josh Chin, CyberSecurity Consultant at Net Force. The crux of the problem lies in the fact that a great number of users don't bother using any of the protection settings and leave their data open to everyone.

 

"Searching for pictures of employees that work at a certain company will yield pictures of friends, friends of friends and in cases even more. If some of these pictures are considered inappropriate it may put the company and the employee at more of a reputational risk," comments Tom Eston, Manager, Profiling and Penetration Team at SecureState.

 

Protect your privacy

 

It's clear that everyone should review and adjust their privacy settings in order to restrict the uncovering of sensitive data in Graph Search. Tim Senft, Founder of Facecrooks, recommends the following settings:

 

1. Restrict “Who can look me up?” to just Friends.

2. Don’t let search engines link to your Timeline.

3. Review all of your posts and things you’re tagged in.

4. Limit who can see your future posts.

 

What about data access? Alex Doll, CEO of OneID, believes users should turn on Login Approvals. While not the endgame, functions that require a code from a second device such as a cell phone make it harder for attackers to access your data.

 

Using Facebook responsibly comes down to common sense and data hygiene. "You should use Facebook as if anything that you posted there was available to everybody in the world, and as if there were people actively going through your information in order to see how to sell things to you or worse," according to Dominique Karg, Chief Hacking Officer at AlienVault.

 

Check your privacy settings and be cautious with the data you share, you never know who can misuse it. For detailed information on how to lock down your Facebook account, I invite you to read this Facecrooks article as well as Rik Ferguson's blog post.

 

Aerospace and defense firms targeted with clever spear phishing

Aerospace and defense firms targeted with clever spear phishing

Posted on 31.01.2013 Directors, vice presidents and other top management of companies in the aerospace industry and U.S. government and defense contractors have recently been targeted with a highly believable spear phishing campaign (click on the screenshot to enlarge it):


According to Symantec researchers, the content of all the sent out emails was the same, and the attackers aimed at making it seem as though the email originally came from the company that authored the report, then forwarded by employees.

Once downloaded and run, the attached malicious PDF file attempts to exploit a Adobe Flash Player vulnerability, and if it succeeds, it drops a malicious version of the svchost.exe file into the computer. The PDF also opens itself so that the targets don't become suspicious.

The executable then drops a malicious version of the ntshrui.dll file into the Windows directory, and makes explorer.exe run it.

It all ends with the victims having a permanent backdoor opened on their computer, and it contacts its C&C server (from which it gets further updates), enumerates disk drives, steals system information and forwards it all to the C&C server. Judging by this, this espionage campaign is currently in the reconnaissance phase.

"Organizations should ensure proper email security is in place and also make patch management a priority, as the vulnerability exploited here was patched in 2011," the researchers point out.

CMA CGM Sells Terminal Link to CMHI - PortMiami gets Chinese tenant.

PortMiami gets is first China owned Terminal

 

25 January 2013, 18:30 / SeaNews / Rating: 18

CMA CGM and China Merchants Holdings (International) Company Limited (CMHI) have announced that January 25 they signed the Share Purchase Agreement regarding the sale of 49% equity interest in Terminal Link. The deal is worth 400 mn euros. Following some pre-closing reorganization, the transaction is expected to complete within the first half of 2013, subject to certain external regulatory approvals.

CMA CGM Chairman and CEO Jacques R. Saadé noticed that the partnership with CMHI ‘represents a unique opportunity to accelerate the Group development into terminals investments internationally’. CMHI Chairman Fu Yuning emphasized that ‘Terminal Link's exposure to terminals in emerging markets and its potential pipeline of new projects present another driver for its volume growth and financial returns in the future’. He added, “In addition, the transaction reflects the closer working relationship we are forging with CMA CGM.”

Terminal Link, 100% subsidiary of the CMA CGM Group, operates, develops and invests in a global network of 15 terminals including a partnership with APM at PortMiami. According to CMA CGM, Terminal Link ranks #12 worldwide based on throughput handled with a volume of 8.1 mn TEU handled in 2011.

CMHI, the largest public port operator in China, invests in and operates port business from a portfolio located primarily in 8 major cities along China Mainland's 5 most economically-active regions (Shenzhen, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Ningbo, Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen and Zhanjiang). Recently it also added to its port portfolio assets in Colombo of Sri Lanka and in Africa. The total container volume handled by its port portfolio exceeds 60 mn TEU in 2012.

Maersk buys out CMA to own Mobile port. Is Terminal Link terminal at Miami next?Terminal Link’s Maersk and CMA CGM coalition in a shakeup Terminal Link terminal at Port of Miami owned today by CMA CGM and Maersk's APM unit. July 9 (Reuters) - APM Terminals, a unit of Danish shipping and oil group A.P. Moll... Posted at 08:50 AM in Breaking news, Caribbean Basin ports, Logistics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

 

Related articles

CMA CGM Deal Will Bring 2.6 Million Containers Through Port of Long Beach

Red October cyber attack in fifth year against governments, energy companies, embassies, and aerospace companies

January 14, Wired.com

– (International) Cybersleuths uncover 5-year spy operation targeting governments, others. Kaspersky Lab researchers uncovered a sophisticated, long-running cyber espionage campaign targeting governments, energy companies, embassies, and aerospace companies dubbed ‘Red October.’ The malware used is customized to individual targets, uses a complex command and control system, and utilizes spear phishing attacks to infect victims. Source: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/red-october-spy-campaign/all/

Containerized coke shipments flow with ease through Dominican Republic

Cocaine trafficking increased dramatically in the Dominican Republic

Posted on December 28, 2012 By VOXXI Politics

Cocaine trafficking through the Caribbean to Europe has increased

800 percent in the past two years due to the lack of technological resources in ports. (Shutterstock)

Cocaine trafficking through the Caribbean en route to Europe and United States has increased 800 percent in the past two years due, among other reasons, to the lack of technological resources in ports such as the Multimodal Caucedo Port and the Port of Haina, according to the conclusions of the seminar “Police Investigation of maritime cocaine trafficking, with special reference to container traffic.”

 

During this seminar, held from December 10 to 12 in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, it was pointed out that those two Dominican ports together move approximately four million containers a year headed for the European Union and the United States of America.

In a concluding document, the seminar noted that maritime cocaine trafficking is an extremely important modality of international trafficking in this narcotic.

Several experts have critized that the lack of control in the seaports of the Dominican Republic poses a major threat to the national security interests of United States as the country has emerged as the center of drug trafficking in the Caribbean.

The current system in place to control the shipments through the Dominican Republic is inadequate and as a result it has generated a lot of criticism from the U.S. Congress and the European countries.

With the same inspections system in place, the increase of violence and criminal activities will affect dramatically the tourism industry of the Dominican Republic and spread the image of the country as unfriendly toward international companies.

To effectively combat the organizations engaged in this criminal activity, full cooperation is needed between the police units that specialize in narcotics trafficking investigation and the Customs Services, the document adds.

The European Union COPOLAD Program (drug partnership cooperation program between the European Union and Latin America) organized the Seminar to establish an international forum for discussion of the issue, bringing together multidisciplinary opinions and experiences.

During the seminar, many aspects of the threat of global organized crime manifested through maritime cocaine trafficking were explored.

Marino Vinicio Castillo, advisor to the Executive Branch on drugs, said that large amounts of drugs continue to be moved out of Dominican ports, and called for strengthening of security and oversight measures.

Castillo said that, in spite of intervention by the National Drug Control Directorate and enhanced vigilance, the Haina and Caucedo Multimodal ports continue to experience drug trafficking problems.

Castillo stressed the need to include X-rays in Dominican ports to ensure more comprehensive oversight of the merchandise entering and leaving.

Fidias Aristy, President for the National Drug control Directorate, confirms  the urgency to have X-ray technology to supervise the control of containers at the Dominican ports in an effort to the combat narcotics problem in the island.  Mr. Aristy has been a strong advocate of this technology to help with the problem.

Fighting against drug trafficking is also essential to reduce the high level of crime and violence in the Dominican Republic. One of the latest cases that has attracted the attention of the country is the tragedy suffered by Francina Hungria Hernandez, shot in the face at the end of November, 2012, by unknown assailants.

The tragedy of the young Francina is one of the hundreds crimes occurred in the country during the year because of the increased influence of the illegal drugs and drug traffickers that supply all kind of drugs to the Dominican youth.

Criminal organizations prefer maritime trafficking

During the conference in Punta Cana, special attention was paid to the most important aspects of the structures of the criminal organizations engaged in cocaine trafficking, their modus operandi, sea routes, police investigation methodology, the importance of international cooperation in the fight against this illegal trafficking, recent initiatives being implemented by the EU Member States, comprehensive  port security and  analysis of the risk of pleasure craft, merchant vessels, and especially, container ships.

The criminal organizations try to smuggle most of the cocaine by sea transport routes, using various types of vessels, speedboats, fishing boats, sporting boats, semi-rigid inflatables and so forth. Thus it has been suggested that it would be advisable to increase international maritime cooperation in order to try to decrease illegal sea trafficking in cocaine, highlighting, in this respect, implementation of article 17 of the 1988 UN Convention.

It was noted during the seminar that an increase in the use of semi-submersibles and submersibles in the trafficking of cocaine chlorhydrate has been detected. These are equipped with cutting-edge technology, infrared cameras, quick closing electro valves, with capacity to transport between 3.5 and 5 tons of cocaine, and a navigation depth of 15 to 20 meters, making it even more difficult, if possible, to locate and seize the drugs.

The countries threatened by the sphere of activity of these types of vessels believe it is important to have legislation aimed at penalizing construction activity, logistical support, and crew, citing as an example the Colombian experience with the promulgation of Law 1311 of 2009.

It has been said that comprehensive port security results in prevention and control philosophies and systems that harmonize with the personality of the port’s activities, optimizing the security resources so that the preventive controls and inspections are based on cooperation among all parts of the system, in turn using the information and its analysis as the backbone of security operations.

Last November, the U.S. Ambassador Raul Yzaguirre support the proposed installation of X-rays in the ports of the country.  The diplomat said that the U.S. government is doing everything possible to prevent the flow of drugs through the country.

“We will increase the efforts and resources to address the drug issue. It’s a serious problem and we recognize that although the Dominican Republic is not the highest hub for the transhipment of drugs, when we start to control the flow in Central America, the trend is a diversion to the Caribbean and the Dominican Republic,” he said to the newspaper Diario Libre.

Izaguirre highlighted the need to increase the control of all shipments through the Dominican Republic during a meeting with the Dominican American Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAMDR).

Strangely enough, this organization requested to the Minister of the Presidency, Gustavo Montalvo, the cancellation of  the contract with an American company that has the license to establish a system of digitalization of containers and the installation of X-rays in the ports at one third of the current price.

The weak and insufficient control in the seaports

Controlling the inspections in the seaports is so important that powerful Dominican groups with media connections are lobbying the government of President Danilo Medina to maintain the same weak and inadequate control system that is less effective and more expensive than the one proposed by Border Support Services, Inc., an American company.

Ten years ago, then-president Hipolito Mejia and the Dominican Congress approved a “contract-law” to give the company ICCSI tha management of the inspections, including use of the most advanced screening technology.

ICCSI was bought this year by the US company Border Support Services with the support of an executive order signed by President Leonel Fernandez.

The “contract-law” has not been executed and the Border Support Services  is trying to negotiate its implementation  with prices below the same services currently provided in Puerto Rico and other countries.

Also, a special commission created by President Fernandez gave the green light to Border Support Services to start the inspections with a range of prices below the original prices of ICCSI and the current fees.

Border Support Services has proposed to charge around $50 per container with the most advanced technology in the world provided by the company Smiths Detection, which will allow the inspection of 150 containers per hour. The container without merchandise would cost $25 within a very competitive range of prices.

The current system, run by the company DP World, is charging more than $200 per container and for the most part is done by “visual inspection,” but only to the empty containers without any merchandise and with a small penetration of 140 millimeters, less than half of the system proposed by the Border Support Services, according to Smiths Detection.

The screening machines now in place, donated by the US Embassy in Santo Domingo, can inspect no more than 50 containers per hour.  The system currently in place cannot detect the shipment of illicit drugs and other dangerous goods, according to several specialists.

The status quo opens the door to Dominican import companies to avoid paying taxes and paves the way for drug traffickers to operate in a country where the consumption of drugs have increased considerably.

Read more: http://www.voxxi.com/cocaine-trafficking-increased-caribbean/#ixzz2GSsvu2vO

Doughnuts: Fool proof way to stop school slaughters

Doughnuts: Fool proof way to stop school slaughters

 Eyerdam opinion

 

Miami Dade police executives protect PortMiami from terrorists

We already know how to deter lunatics from slinking into our schools and murdering our children. The Coral Gables police department has shown the way. Without fanfare the taxpayers of Coral Gables pay at least one on-duty, heavily armed patrolman to park conspicuously in front of a synagogue along US 1 in Coral Gables.

 

The patrol is there every day the synagogue has an event and is often doubled when some anti-Semitic signal is sent. Likewise the port of Miami, now called PortMiami, a department of Miami Dade County is protected day and night by high ranking, very armed Miami Dade police executives collecting overtime. You can tell by the photo how they must deter potential terrorists or lunatics.

 

First let’s build a fence around schools, especially those where access is possible from brush or forest. This is already paid for by Homeland Security funds for the ports and airports and strategic resources. Billions in Non-Disaster grant money sits waiting for the ports to spend it on security. So let’s take some of that and protect the schools. We can call them “post incident security facilities” to justify the investment.

 

 Then, let’s get every town and county, small and large to deploy one police vehicle to patrol the roads around school property alert for nut cases in hoodies and long dark jackets, or bulky back packs or folks that look like drug merchants. And let’s have another officer posted in a squad car with a hotline to the principal at the front gate, like Coral Gables does at the synagogue.

 

What other assignment could be more important today to taxpayers than to have police focus on the safety of school property once the kids are inside?

 Where frugal town councils and commissions balk at this plan and refuse to detail on-duty police to protect the children of the community while school is in session and instead want to spend more on off-duty cops, the parents and teachers can provide an alternative attraction.

 Each day, just after classes begin, they can set up a fresh coffee and doughnut stand inside the school’s front door for local law enforcement only. I rest my case.

100 Percent Air Cargo Screening Exits Without Fanfare - Guest Opinion

Written by: Justin Hienz on December 12, 2012

Defense Media Network

 

Did you hear about the recent deadline to screen a million tons of foreign-borne air cargo before takeoff? No? Yeah, me neither.

 

After five years of congressional hearings, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) programs and outreach, millions of dollars in private sector investments, several delays, and much industry handwringing, the final deadline for satisfying Congress’ 100 percent screening rule is now in effect … and no one seems to care.

 

On Monday, Dec. 3, TSA supposedly began enforcing a rule that all air cargo flown from abroad on passenger planes must be screened for explosives. This was a portion of a 2007 federal law mandating all air cargo flown on passenger planes in U.S. airspace be screened for explosives “at the piece level.” That means every pallet, crate, ULD container, coffin and any other cargo would be individually screened.

 

The congressional deadline to meet the law arrived in 2010. Within the United States, TSA began enforcing the mandate, and because of close work with industry, there was no disruption to the domestic supply chain, as had been feared. On the international level, however, TSA didn’t even try to enforce the mandate, because they have no authority to do so. Short of putting TSA screeners in every world airport or denying entry to planes with unscreened cargo, there was no way TSA could do what Congress asked.

 

However, TSA found a solution. The 2007 law demands 100 percent screening, using only that word. The legislative text defines screening as “a physical examination or non-intrusive methods of assessing whether cargo poses a threat to transportation security.” The examples provided in the law are explosives detection technology, canine teams, or a physical search, which are all actually scanning techniques. Domestic tactics have focused on physical inspection at some point in the supply chain, but achieving this level of scanning for international cargo is not possible.

 

Fortunately, the law doesn’t restrict TSA to the scanning examples provided in the text. Screening means using a variety of sources to evaluate risk, such as intelligence and documentation, as well as scanning. In recent years, TSA has pursued a risk-based approach toward cargo screening, which is far more efficient because it draws on data and other intelligence and does not rely on physically inspecting every piece of cargo.

 

Many foreign security regimes reject the 100 percent security philosophy and favor the risk-based approaches TSA now promotes. Because the U.S. screening approach is becoming better aligned with some of America’s largest trade partners, TSA has been able to sign agreements with Canada, Switzerland and the European Union stating those countries’ respective air cargo security programs are commensurate with those of the United States. Thus, all cargo leaving their airspace must be as safe as any cargo in U.S. airspace.

 

Et voilà … 100 percent screening.

 

Well, sort of. The recent agreements cover numerous major airports serving U.S. destinations, but they only account for a handful of countries. Are there agreements with China or Brazil or the UAE? If there are, they haven’t been reported to the public.

 

TSA’s approach toward screening cargo from Europe and Canada is ingenious. It provides a path toward sound security strategy while also satisfying the letter of Congress’ unreasonable law. Continuing to improve air cargo security in this way is a good idea. But there was an updated TSA-set deadline to screen as the law demands, and it arrived a week ago.

 

Since the deadline has passed, TSA is now presumably enforcing the mandate, and all air cargo from abroad is being screened in full. There have been no reports of disruptions to the supply chain, nor any reports from TSA about how the enforcement is going, nor any new reciprocal security agreements announced. The more-than-five-year debacle that was 100 percent air cargo screening has ended without a whisper.

 

It’s just as well. As I have written previously, it was a stupid idea anyway.

 

http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/100-percent-air-cargo-screeni...

No more tracer warnings USCG now will fire loud shotgun rounds in St. Pete

VIDEO RELEASE: Coast Guard implements new non-lethal signaling, warning device in St. Petersburg, Fla.

Video demonstration linked below

http://cgvi.uscg.mil/media/main.php?g2_itemId=1474578

                                    

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Coast Guard personnel stationed in the Sector St. Petersburg area of responsibility are scheduled to use a new non-lethal warning device to aid in security operations beginning January 2013. 

“All Coast Guard ports, waterways and coastal security units in the Sector St. Petersburg AOR will be capable of employing the LA51 signal and warning device,” said Ensign Andrew Denning, a member of Sector St. Petersburg Enforcement Division.

The LA51 is fired from a 12-gauge military shotgun to produce a visible and audible signal at a range of 100 meters. This signal and warning device is considered a safer alternative to the current warning devices used by Coast Guard personnel. It is a shorter range round, and the flash and noise produced by the device are more prominent than a splash in the water caused by the M16 tracer round. Additionally, the Department of Defense’s joint non-lethal weapons program has determined through their testing that the LA51 has a low risk of significant injury.  Additionally, the Coast Guard determined there is no environmental impact when employing LA51.

“The new LA51 warning device is designed to warn boaters in a safe and effective manner if they do not respond to calls on the marine radio from the Coast Guard or comply with our instructions in case of a security violation," said Denning. "Our crews are trained to use the device safely and properly as one of several options for responding to potential maritime threats."

All members authorized to use the LA51 have received proper training and are qualified to use this tool in support of the Coast Guard’s ports, waterways and coastal security mission along the Gulf Coast.

“We will be using the LA51 primarily for the enforcement of security zones and for warning non-compliant vessels,” said Denning.

Coast Guard personnel have tested the device for several years as a warning signal during migrant interdiction and counter-drug operations. In February 2012 it was determined that the device would be added to the toolkit of Coast Guard units performing ports, waterways and coastal security missions.

A local Coast Guard subject matter expert is available for interview regarding the use of the LA51. Please contact Denning at 727-824-7672 for more information and to schedule interviews.

Related articles

Coast Guard implements new non-lethal signaling, warning device in Long Island Sound

CSMS# 12-000565 - IMPORTANT! Upcoming Change to Access ACE Secure Data Portal

CSMS# 12-000565 - IMPORTANT! Upcoming Change to Access ACE Secure Data Portal

12/14/2012 07:47 AM EST

ACE Reports





In response to an OMB mandate, CBP is migrating all public facing applications behind a Trusted Internet Gateway (TIC). The ACE application is one of the public facing CBP applications that will be migrating to the TIC. Migration of the ACE application will consist of a change in the public IP currently associated with the ACE URL. Prior to CBP migrating the ACE application to the TIC, CBP will establish a secondary path via the TIC to the ACE application. Users are being requested to conduct host file testing to ensure they can access the ACE application via this secondary connection prior to CBP migrating the application behind the TIC. Attached you will find instructions for how to make changes to your local host file in order to accomplish this testing. The new public facing IP for this change is 216.81.83.93. You will need administrative rights to your laptop/PC to make these host file changes.



The goal of the testing will be to ensure you can still access the ACE application via the secondary path. After you make the host file changes you should still be able to access ACE login screen using the same URL (ace.cbp.dhs.gov). The established test window for conducting host testing is December 29th - January 9th. If you encounter any problems during testing, please contact David Gilliam (david.lee.gilliam@cbp.dhs.gov), David Griggs (david.griggs@cbp.dhs.gov) and or (james.j.howard@cbp.dhs.gov).








Note that supplemental information to this message is available in the form of one or more file downloads.
Please follow the link in this email message to the CSMS web site to access this information.